Hansika Motwani files Rs 2 crores defamation suit against sister-in-law Muskan Nancy James amid legal battle

Hansika Motwani has initiated legal action against her estranged sister-in-law Muskan Nancy James by filing a defamation suit in a Mumbai sessions court, marking the latest development in an ongoing family dispute. The actor has sought damages amounting to Rs. 2 crores, along with a formal public apology and a court directive restraining James from making further statements against her.

The plea, filed through advocate Adnan Shaikh, alleges that Muskan Nancy James made defamatory accusations on social media, including claims of domestic violence involving Hansika and her brother Prashant Motwani. According to the petition, these allegations are baseless and have caused reputational harm.

Central to the dispute is an alleged financial transaction. Hansika Motwani has claimed that Muskan borrowed Rs. 27 lakhs during her marriage to Prashant Motwani and has failed to repay the amount despite repeated follow-ups. The suit contends that the allegations may have been made to avoid repayment of this loan.

The legal conflict follows an earlier FIR lodged by Muskan Nancy James against her husband and Hansika Motwani. In her complaint, James accused them of harassment, cruelty, and interference in her marriage, along with claims related to demands made during wedding functions. She also stated that the stress from the relationship contributed to her developing Bell’s Palsy.

Responding to these accusations, Hansika has denied any involvement, maintaining that she was not part of the couple’s household and had limited interaction with their personal matters. She has consistently asserted that she cannot be held accountable for the allegations made against her.

In addition to the civil suit, Hansika Motwani has also pursued criminal defamation proceedings against Muskan Nancy James before a magistrate’s court in Andheri under relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. She had earlier approached the Bombay High Court seeking to quash the FIR filed against her, with the court issuing notice on her plea.

A statement issued on her behalf emphasised that she had been wrongly implicated in the dispute and subjected to sustained defamatory coverage. It reiterated that her involvement in her brother’s marriage was minimal and that the allegations lack judicial backing.

The matter, which stems from the strained marriage between Prashant Motwani and Muskan Nancy James, is now expected to come up for hearing before the Dindoshi sessions court in due course.

Also Read: Hansika Motwani and Sohael Khaturiya granted divorce; no alimony sought, says lawyer

BTS World Tour ‘Arirang’ to hit Indian theatres as PVR INOX announces exclusive screenings; deets inside

Continuing its commitment to bringing the world’s most iconic cultural moments to the big screen, PVR INOX Limited, India’s leading multiplex chain, announced the exclusive screening of the BTS World Tour ‘Arirang’. The cinematic event will feature live viewings and select re-broadcasts of the global icons' performances from Goyang on April 11 and Tokyo on April 18, 2026.

The release of ‘Arirang’ follows a series of highly successful and sold-out K-pop screenings at PVR INOX, including ‘Yet to Come in Cinemas,’ ‘Burn the Stage,’ and the 2025 HYBE Cine Fest. PVR INOX has consistently witnessed strong nationwide demand, often leading to additional shows and screens being added across cities. By securing the license for this tour, PVR INOX reinforces its position as the premier destination for experiential entertainment and youth culture in India.

The screenings will be hosted across an expansive network of 20+ cities including Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Kolkata, Gurugram, Pune, Ahmedabad, and Guwahati, catering to the immense demand from the Indian BTS ARMY.

Commenting on the announcement, Mr. Aamer Bijli, Lead Specialist – Innovation, Film Marketing, and Digital Programming, PVR INOX Limited, said, “At PVR INOX, we are constantly pushing the boundaries of what the cinema experience can be. BTS is more than just a musical act; they are a global phenomenon that resonates deeply with Gen Z and millennial audiences. By bringing the ‘Arirang’ tour to our screens, we are providing a communal space for fans to celebrate their idols with the best-in-class sound and visual technology that only a theatre can provide. We are also seeing a strong shift towards experiential cinema, where audiences are seeking immersive, shared experiences beyond traditional film viewing.”

PVR INOX has observed a significant shift in consumer behavior regarding concert films. Previous BTS screenings have seen nationwide sell-outs, leading to the addition of extra screens to accommodate the passionate fandom. There is also a notable rise in group bookings and fandom-driven participation, with audiences particularly Gen Z, urban professionals, and K-pop enthusiasts actively seeking communal viewing experiences. Screening Schedule & Locations:

April 11, 2026: Live from Goyang April 18, 2026: Live from Tokyo

Participating Cities: Delhi, Gurgaon, Faridabad, Chandigarh, Mohali, Dehradun, Bengaluru, Bhubaneswar, Lucknow, Ahmedabad, Vadodara, Surat, Mumbai, Pune, Nasik (Nashik), Ludhiana, Jalandhar, Ranchi, Indore, Kolkata, Jaipur, Udaipur, Raipur, Patna, and Guwahati.

Also Read: BTS announces new album release on March 20, confirms world tour plans; details inside!

Dhurandhar The Revenge faces copyright suit over alleged unauthorised use of ‘Rang De Lal’

Production banner Trimurti Films has filed a lawsuit against filmmaker Aditya Dhar’s company B62 Studios, alleging unauthorised use of the song ‘Rang De Lal’ in the film Dhurandhar The Revenge. The dispute relates to the rights to the track, which originally appeared in the 1989 film Tridev. The song was co-composed by Anand–Milind, written by Sameer Anjaan, and sung by Amit Kumar and Sapna Mukherjee.

What the lawsuit alleges According to sources familiar with the matter, Trimurti Films has claimed ownership or control over the relevant rights connected to the musical work and sound recording of ‘Rang De Lal’. The company has alleged that the song, or a version substantially similar to it, was used in the film without obtaining the necessary permissions.

The suit states that such use amounts to copyright infringement, including unauthorised reproduction and communication of the work to the public.

Trimurti Films has sought an injunction to restrain further use of the song, along with damages and related reliefs. The production house has also raised concerns about the commercial exploitation of the track through theatrical screenings, streaming platforms and promotional material linked to the film.

Dhurandhar The Revenge is a 2026 Hindi-language spy action thriller directed by Aditya Dhar. The film is produced by Jio Studios and B62 Studios and serves as the sequel to Dhurandhar (2025).

The sequel was released on March 19, and has remained in the spotlight due to its strong box office performance as well as multiple legal developments related to the film.

Also Read: Dhurandhar Row: Bombay High Court restrains plagiarism accuser; relief for director Aditya Dhar

Dhurandhar Row: Bombay High Court restrains plagiarism accuser; relief for director Aditya Dhar

In a recent development surrounding Dhurandhar The Revenge, the Bombay High Court has granted interim relief to director Aditya Dhar by restricting filmmaker Santosh Kumar from making further public statements about the film that could harm his reputation.

The order was passed on Wednesday by Justice Arif Doctor after hearing submissions made on behalf of Dhar. The court noted that, at this stage, Dhar had presented sufficient grounds to seek protection, and directed Kumar to refrain from repeating or issuing any statements against the filmmaker or his film until the matter is heard again. The case has now been scheduled for further hearing on April 16.

The dispute began shortly after the release of Dhurandhar The Revenge, starring Ranveer Singh. Santosh Kumar had held a press conference alleging that the film’s story was copied from his own script, which he claimed to have registered with the Screenwriters Association in 2023. According to him, the script, titled D Saheb, had earlier been pitched to multiple production houses before Dhar allegedly used it for his film.

Responding to these claims, Dhar approached the court, stating that the allegations were baseless and had caused damage to his professional reputation. His legal team argued that the statements made during the press conference were widely circulated online through multiple videos and social media posts, amplifying their impact.

The court was informed that Dhar had already sent a legal notice to Kumar, asking him to stop making what he described as unverified accusations. However, Kumar neither replied to the notice nor appeared before the court during the hearing.

During the proceedings, Dhar’s side maintained that if Kumar believed his work had been copied, he was free to pursue appropriate legal action. However, they stressed that making public allegations without proof was unfair and damaging.

Taking note of the situation, the court directed Kumar to hold back from making any further remarks related to the film or Dhar until the issue is examined in detail.

Dhurandhar The Revenge, which has been receiving attention for its intense narrative and ensemble cast, has been in the spotlight not only for its box office performance but also due to this ongoing legal dispute. The next hearing is expected to determine the course of action in the case.

Also Read: ‘The film carries your choices in every frame’: Aditya Dhar credits Mukesh Chhabra for Dhurandhar’s casting

Kartik Aaryan takes legal route to protect his identity, flags online misuse

Actor Kartik Aaryan has approached the Bombay High Court, alleging unauthorised commercial use of his personality across multiple online platforms, in a move that underscores growing concerns over digital misuse of celebrity identities.

According to reports, the actor has filed an intellectual property (IP) suit seeking protection of his name, image, likeness, and other identifiable attributes, which he claims are being used without consent. The plea targets several online platforms as well as unidentified individuals, often referred to as “John Doe” parties, accused of exploiting his persona for commercial gain.

In his petition, Kartik has sought a permanent injunction to restrain entities from using his identity in advertisements, merchandise, or digital content. He has also urged the court to direct platforms to take down such material and disclose details of those responsible. The actor’s legal team has argued that the misuse extends to emerging digital formats, including manipulated content and AI-generated material, raising concerns around privacy and publicity rights in an increasingly tech-driven ecosystem. The plea stresses that such unauthorised usage not only violates his rights but also risks misleading the public.

The case is expected to be heard shortly, with Kartik seeking urgent relief to prevent further exploitation of his personality. This development comes amid a broader trend of celebrities moving court to safeguard their personality rights against misuse on social media and e-commerce platforms. Courts in India have, in recent months, taken note of such concerns, particularly in cases involving deepfakes, fake endorsements, and unauthorised digital reproductions.

Also Read: Kartik Aaryan brings home Mercedes-Benz V-Class worth up to Rs 1.7 crore

Salman Khan moves NCDRC after Jaipur consumer court issues bailable warrants in Rajshree Elaichi ad case

Actor Salman Khan has approached the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), alleging that the Jaipur District Consumer Commission acted unfairly in proceedings related to a complaint over his endorsement of “Rajshree Elaichi.”

The development comes after the district commission issued bailable warrants against Khan for allegedly failing to comply with its earlier direction to stop misleading advertisements connected to the product. Salman Khan claims orders were not served to him Appearing for the actor, Senior Advocate Ravi Prakash argued before the NCDRC that certified copies of the district commission’s orders were not provided to Khan, even though those same orders were already circulating in media reports. According to the plea, coercive steps were taken against the actor despite him not receiving official copies of the orders.

The petition also stated that the interim order passed earlier in the case “was not in the knowledge of the petitioner and never served,” adding that penal proceedings under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 should not have been initiated without proper service. Case relates to complaint over Rajshree Elaichi advertisement The matter stems from a complaint filed in December 2025 by advocate Yogendra Singh Badiyal before the Jaipur District Consumer Commission against Rajshree Pan Masala and Salman Khan, who was named as Opposite Party No. 2 in his role as brand ambassador. The complaint alleged that advertisements for “Rajshree Elaichi” were effectively surrogate promotions for pan masala and amounted to misleading advertising under the Consumer Protection Act.

On January 6, 2026, the district commission passed an interim order directing the respondents to refrain from misleading advertisements until they filed their reply. According to Khan’s plea, this order was passed ex parte and without prior notice to him. Bailable warrants issued in contempt proceedings The complainant later alleged that the interim order had been violated after a hoarding featuring Salman Khan appeared in public, following which a contempt application was filed under Section 72 of the Act. On January 15, 2026, the district commission issued bailable warrants against Khan in connection with the contempt proceedings. The actor challenged this decision before the Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, but the State Commission dismissed his appeal on March 16, 2026 and upheld the district commission’s order. Actor raises concern over direction to form Special Task Force During the hearing before the NCDRC, Khan’s counsel also argued that after issuing bailable warrants, the district commission directed the formation of a Special Task Force to secure the actor’s presence. According to the plea, such directions were unusual in consumer proceedings and reflected a disproportionate approach.

The NCDRC took note of concerns raised about certified copies of orders not being provided to the parties while appearing in media reports. At the same time, the Commission observed that its jurisdiction remains defined by statute and cannot extend beyond the framework of the law.

Also Read: SCOOP: Salman Khan’s Maatrubhumi misses May window; June release on the cards 

Raj Kundra breaks silence with explosive post: “Enough!! I will not be judged by noise, only by justice”

After maintaining a largely low profile in the face of prolonged scrutiny, Raj Kundra has publicly addressed the controversies surrounding him, issuing a strong statement on social media. The businessman, who has often been in the spotlight due to both his personal life and legal challenges, took to X (formerly Twitter) to express his stance, signalling a shift from silence to direct engagement.

In his post, Kundra wrote, “Justice delayed is justice denied. I’ve stayed silent, I’ve respected the system, and endured media trials, speculation & trolling. Enough!! I want the truth through a fair and final verdict. If found guilty by a court of law, I will face every consequence. Until then, I will not be judged by noise, only by justice. Raj Kundra.”

Justice delayed is justice denied. I’ve stayed silent, respected the system, and endured media trials, speculation & trolling.

Enough!!

I want the truth through a fair & final verdict.

If found guilty by a court of law, I will face every consequence. Until then, I will not…

— Raj Kundra (@onlyrajkundra) April 6, 2026

The statement marks one of his most direct responses to the public discourse surrounding his cases. For years, Kundra had refrained from addressing criticism in detail, opting instead to let legal proceedings take their course. However, his latest message suggests growing frustration with what he describes as “media trials” and online speculation.

Kundra has been dealing with multiple legal matters over the past few years. Most recently, in February 2026, he was granted bail by a special PMLA court in connection with a money laundering case linked to an alleged Bitcoin Ponzi scheme. Investigating authorities have claimed that he received a significant amount of cryptocurrency from the alleged mastermind for a failed mining project, while Kundra has maintained that his role was limited.

In addition to this, Kundra and his wife, Shilpa Shetty, are also facing a cheating case filed by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW), involving allegations tied to a financial transaction linked to their former business venture. The matter remains under legal consideration.

These developments come in the backdrop of the 2021 case that had drawn widespread attention, following which Kundra had spent time in judicial custody before being granted bail. Since then, the businessman has largely avoided detailed public commentary on the issues.

With his latest statement, Kundra appears to be seeking closure through the judicial process rather than ongoing public debate. By calling for a “fair and final verdict,” he has made it clear that he intends to rely on the courts to determine the outcome, even as discussions around the cases continue in the public domain.

Also Read: Raj Kundra gets relief from Bombay High Court in dispute over Rajasthan Royals stake